Author: Giorgi Khatiashvili
The number of trees that were cut down in Tbilisi for being damaged had increased at least five times in 2016 compared to previous years, even though the total number of removed trees had remained unchanged.
This finding raises questions about the integrity of the process of examining trees and declaring them to be damaged by the City Hall. In the summer of 2016, civil society organizations already discovered a case of alleged violation in this regard.
In summer 2016, Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI) requested Tbilisi City Hall to disclose information on the construction of residential and commercial buildings, permits issued for cutting down trees, income generated from such permits, and unlawfully removed trees.
According to Tbilisi Architectural Service, in 2011-2016 (until 28 August) 1,747 permits were issued to build residential apartments and multifunctional buildings.
The most number of permits were issued in 2011 – 375. In 2012, this number dropped to 142 but rose again in 2013 and in 2015 reached 334. This increase seems to continue in 2016 as well, since 255 permits had been issued in the first 8 months alone.
Permits to Cut Down Trees
As a response to IDFI’s request to disclose information about trees removed for construction purposes, instead of providing aggregate data, Tbilisi City Hall decided to send copies of individual permits that were issued by the Ecology Department in 2011-2016. Moreover, according to City Hall, it was unable to locate a part of the documentation from 2011-2012 in the database.
According to the provided documents, in the period between 2013 and August 16, 2016, 583 permits were issued to cut down 3,552 trees, 827 of which had been decaled to be damaged.
The data shows that there is a fivefold increase in the number of damaged trees in 2016. 500 of the 709 trees cut down in 2016 (until 16 August) were declared damaged. To compare, in 2015, only 111 were given this status from 1,088 removed trees; in 2014 this number was 80 out of 809, and in 2013 only 36 out of 946.
Unfortunately, in some cases, the copies of the permits provided by Tbilisi City Hall did not contain information about the reasons for allowing the removal of trees. Therefore, it is impossible to say exactly how many trees were removed due to construction.
For example, on August 2, 2016, a company called Orbi Group Tbilisi Ltd. was permitted to cut down 44 and transplant 4 trees from its property on Kazbegi street. The permit does not specify the purpose for this action. However, since Orbi Group is a construction company, it can be assumed that this purpose was construction.
Among 583 permits on the removal of trees issued 2013 – 2016, 392 specify that construction was the reason for issuing the permit. In 2016 (as of August 16), 30% (35) of issued permits specified construction as the purpose. In 2015, this number was 76% (132); 87% (108) in 2014; and 68% (117) in 2013.
Income Generated from Issuing Permits
Tbilisi City Hall received total income of GEL 1,947,282 from granting permits to remove trees in the period between 2011 and 2016:
Trees Removed Unlawfully for Construction Purposes
Tbilisi City Hall provided information on unlawfully removed trees only for the period of 2014-2016. Like in the pervious case, IDFI could not identify the exact number of trees removed due to construction.
According to the disclosed information, in 2014 -2016, Tbilisi City Hall identified 1,823 trees that were cut down or damaged illegally; in 2016 this number was 274, 839 in 2015, and 710 in 2014.
This illegal removal of trees cost the city GEL 1,104,713 in 2015-2016 (until August 31).
The Georgian legislation determines the rules of compensation for damaged or destroyed trees. The sum is calculated according to the tree’s annual growth rings. For instance, each annual growth ring of an especially valuable coniferous tree costs GEL 100; GEL 50 in case of a deciduous tree. For more common tree species the cost ranges from GEL 8 to 12. For smaller plants like bushes the cost is calculated based on the plant’s diameter.
According to Article 151 of Administrative Offences Code of Georgia:
“1. Damage and/or unauthorized cutting of green plantings on lands owned by a self-governing unit, or damage of landscape strips shall carry a fine of GEL 500, with confiscation of the object of the offence.
2. The same act committed repeatedly shall carry a fine of GEL 1,000, with confiscation of the object of the offence.”
The regulation extends over plants on private property as well. According to the December 12, 2014 decree of Tbilisi City Council, “the owner of the land is obligated to care, protect, and nurture the growth and development plants on its territory”.
Moreover, the removal or relocation of plants on private property also requires permission and notification of Tbilisi City Hall.
Integrity of the Process of Examining Trees
Considering the fact that in 2016, compared to other years, the proportion of damaged trees in the total number of removed trees increased at least five times, one has to question the integrity of the process of examining trees for damage.
For example, the removal of trees at Kazbegi 22 in summer 2016 was followed by a big public outcry. Civils society organizations (CSO) claimed that healthy trees were removed and questioned the validity of the conclusion made by the City Hall which declared them to be damaged. On August 19, the Prosecutor’s Office opened a criminal investigation under Article 303 of the Criminal Code, which includes fine, up to one year public work, and up to three years of imprisonment for unlawfully cutting down or damaging plants. The investigation is still ongoing.
It is Tbilisi City Hall that determines which organizations issue expert opinions on the condition of specific trees. According to the disclosed documentation, in 2016, expert opinions of the following organizations Georgian National Botanical Garden, Forest Company and Forest Company+ were most often cited when issuing permits.
NGOs believe that it is necessary to specify the procedure and the responsible body for assessing trees further, because there is no control mechanism for how thoroughly the trees are being examined.
Risks Associated with the Legislative Proposal
On December 15, 2016, construction company m2 appealed to the Parliament to remove, in expedited manner, the regulation requiring payment of compensation for cutting damaged trees. The legislative proposal was introduced in the Parliament removing the obligation to compensate damages to biodiversity. Interestingly, according to the documentation sent to IDFI, in 2014-2016 m2 requested permission from Tbilisi City Hall to remove 94 trees, out of which only 4 were damaged.
IDFI believes that the above legislative proposal contains several risks:
1) Construction companies could deliberately damage trees on their territory, in order to avoid paying fees.
2) The income generated by issuing tree-cutting permits would significantly decrease. In the first 8 months of 2016, the income from permits amounted to GEL 666,778. 70 % of that sum was payed to cut down damaged tree.
3) The risk of corruption in the Tbilisi City Hall will increase in the process of determining which tree is damaged.
 The term construction is used to imply not only building of residential apartments, but also of roads and other infrastructural modifications.
Advancing the Progress toward Achieving the SDGs Post-Covid-19 - IDFI’s Panel Discussion for the 54th Annual Meeting of ADB07.05.2021
Joint Statement by IDFI and GYLA on Delays in Development of the Public Administration Reform and Anti-Corruption Strategic Documents10.05.2021
Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland: Breach of Domestic Law on Judicial Appointments Violated the Right to a Fair Trial10.02.2021
Were Georgians Beloved in the Soviet Union?23.11.2020