Civil society organizations and citizens address diplomatic missions accredited in Georgia with regards to circumstamces related to court.
Letter to the Diplomatic Missions
On behalf of Georgian people, who are deeply concerned with the ongoing state of judiciary in the country, we are contacting you as active supporters of Georgia’s democratic development. On different occasions we have addressed government, political entities and various institutions regarding these concerns. However, we have not approached you on this matter before, as decisions regarding the development of the country should be carried out by its citizens and international partners can only provide their kind recommendations and support in this regard. Nevertheless, we have decided to approach you directly with our grievances, as we see the risks that your name and resources could be misused to legitimize the process, which instead of creating an independent judiciary aims to strengthen influences of interested group within the judiciary.
Georgian population has experienced unfair justice practices on the large-scale throughout its history. Society is fully aware that at present vital decisions are being made regarding the justice system. Unfortunately, latest developments on the subject have demonstrated that the steps taken were not sufficient for the creation of strong and independent judiciary.
Georgian justice system at present is facing certain abnormalities. Activities and erroneous reforms of present and former governments, has enabled small group of judges to take control over the High Council of Justice. Mentioned group uses its capacity to strengthen their power instead of improving the judiciary itself. Societal trust towards the system declines daily and the reform itself is in the dead-end.
It is fallacious to assume that drafting selection procedures and criteria for the Supreme Court judges could straighten the crisis, which the justice system is facing. Only way out of this dire situation is the resignation of members of the so called “clan”, alongside with their 11 supporters sitting at the High Council of Justice and only afterwards we could truly talk about the reformation of the Council.
As of now Chairman of the Parliament facilitates the process of drafting selection procedures and criteria of assigning new members to the Supreme Court. As you might know, multitude of actors protested against the undemocratic format and agenda of the meeting held by the Chairman on 27th of January.
Amidst this tension, Parliament publicizes the news of meeting Speaker of the Parliament with diplomatic corps to discuss the details of apparently finalized version of the draft law. Additionally, according to provided information, certain alterations to the draft has been made based on your recommendations. We cannot be certain how well this information reflects the real context of your meeting, however, we stay hopeful that without the consultation with interested parties the diplomatic corps would have not expressed its support towards the draft.
Draft law about which only general ideas are known to us, seems to be created in a way, to formally officiate the outcomes which the influential group of judges intended to achieve in December last year.
We would like to note that we value the role you have played throughout the year in helping to strengthen and reform the justice sector in Georgia, thusly based on the urgency of the situation we would like to urge you:
– To once again express your clear stand on the outcomes of judicial reforms in Georgia;
– To be cautious your name not to be used to legitimize processes, which do not reflect and express the needs of Georgian people;
– To take into consideration that clear procedures and criteria can only serve its purpose, if the High Council of Justice will be fully renewed in accordance with pluralistic approach.
Maia Bakradze, Former judge at Tbilisi Court of Appeals
Dato Laghidze, White Noise Movement
Kakha Tsikarishvili, Lawyer, Professor of Law
Lia Mukhashavria, Human Rights Priority
Besik Sisvadze, Former judge at Tbilisi City Court
Tea Khamkhadze, Former judge at Tbilisi City Court
Ana Natsvlishvili, Activist/Professor of law
Kakha Kozhoridze, Lawyer
Ucha Nanuashvili, Former Ombudsman of Georgia
Maia Mtsariashvili, former Chairperson at Tbilisi Disctrict Court
Irakli Kordzakhia, Lawyer
Zaza Khatiashvili, Former Chairman of Georgia’s Bar Association
Rati Amaghlobeli, Poet
Ioseb Baratashvili, Lawyer
Vakhushti Menabde, Associated professor at Ilia’s state University
Nikoloz Legashvili, Lawyer
Davit Jandieri, Professor of law/Analyst at the center of strategic analysis
Mamuka Akhvlediani, Former Chairman at Tbilisi City Court
Irakli Gabrichidze, Lawyer
Lasha Tughushi, Liberal Acedemy
Tornike Bakradze, Lawyer/Mediator
Article 42 of the Constitution
Human Rights Center
Transparency International Georgia
Human Right Education and Monitoring Center (EMC)
Open Society Foundation – Georgia (OSGF)
Institution for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI)
Civic Integration Foundation
Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association (GYLA)
Georgia’s Democratic Initiative (GDI)
UN Association of Georgia
Progress of Implementing GRECO Recommendations on Prevention of Corruption Remains Low in Georgia15.04.2021
The Exhibition - Voice of Women07.04.2021
Statement by IDFI and the Social Justice Center Concerning the Annual Report of the State Inspector's Service07.04.2021
The Coalition Reacts to the Announced Changes in the Rule of the Composition of the Supreme Court29.03.2021
IDFI’s Statement on Personal Life Footage23.03.2021
Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland: Breach of Domestic Law on Judicial Appointments Violated the Right to a Fair Trial10.02.2021
Were Georgians Beloved in the Soviet Union?23.11.2020